Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marcelina Podlinska vs Chiara Scholl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Podlinska vs Scholl analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Marcelina Podlinska vs Chiara Scholl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Podlinska 0 - 0 Scholl
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Podlinska has won 43.17% of points on their second serve, while Scholl has won 37.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Podlinska, in recent form, has won 59.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Scholl has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 47.43% and 36.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Podlinska has saved 49.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Scholl has saved 42.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Podlinska has won 56.45% of matches played (W/L 35/ 27), with Scholl winning 47.06% (W/L 16/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Podlinska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 79/ 59), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Scholl has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 293/ 221), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Podlinska has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 22/ 15), where as Scholl has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 14/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Podlinska has played against opponents with an average rank of 143.08 while Scholl has played against players with an average rank of 261.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Podlinska has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Scholl has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Podlinska has converted 50.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Scholl has converted 68.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
755
Rank
746
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
628
Rank
164
High
31
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
53% (103-90)
Career Total W/L
55% (436-361)
61% (22-14)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$18,348
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Marcelina Podlinska vs Chiara Scholl For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Podlinska VS Scholl
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marcelina Podlinska | Chiara Scholl |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (22/14) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (46/33) | 40% (4/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (372/315) | 43% (38/50) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (22/14) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.63 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:21 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 145.22 | 70.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (1542/2040) | 49% (146/300) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (841/1542) | 62% (91/146) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (215/498) | 38% (58/154) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (162/322) | 68% (15/22) |
| Return Pts W% | 52% (1048/2034) | 42% (100/239) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (6/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (16/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (22/36) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (16/4) | 0% (1/0) |
Marcelina Podlinska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Stephanie Judith Visscher
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
85%
(
50 of
59)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Ingrid Vojcinakova
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
50%
(
13 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
49%
(
18 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuki Naito
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Franziska Sziedat
78%
(
69 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Yasmine Kabbaj
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Barbora Michalkova
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dora Miskovic
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Emma Slavikova
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anamaria Federica Oana
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chiara Scholl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Chiara Scholl
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
98)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Chiara Scholl
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
98)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stephanie Wagner
Player
Chiara Scholl
42%
(
14 of
33)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chiara Scholl
Player
Viktorie Hazmukova
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Chiara Scholl
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Chiara Scholl
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
12
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastianna Scilipoti
Player
Chiara Scholl
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
12 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 1-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chiara Scholl
Player
Raquel Ducet Teixeira
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Chiara Scholl
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Chiara Scholl
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve %
50%
(
13 of
26)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
11 of
14)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
34
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Podlinska Vs Scholl Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Podlinska are available here and Scholl photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
